Photograph of an avocado resting on a pink tabletop with a measuring tape around it.

Renewed Justification for Triglyceride-Lowering Therapy: Insight from REDUCE-IT

|

Provide your email address to receive notifications of new blog posts and podcast episodes.

An accumulating body of evidence has implicated hypertriglyceridemia as a treatable risk factor for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD).(1) Most notably, the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) provided renewed and convincing justification for triglyceride-lowering therapy in at-risk individuals with optimally controlled low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels.(2) The results of this landmark study have built upon previous Mendelian randomization studies that have identified elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as a causal risk factor of cardiovascular disease, systemic and arterial wall inflammation, and all-cause mortality.(3-7) It is estimated that the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia among adult men and women in the United States is greater than 25%, highlighting the significance, relevance, and importance for triglyceride-lowering therapy.(8)

REDUCE-IT was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 8179 patients with established cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus and at least one ASCVD risk factor.(2) At the time of enrollment, all patients were receiving statin therapy, had a measured serum LDL-C below 100 mg per deciliter (2.59 mmol per liter) and a fasting triglyceride level greater than 135 mg per deciliter (1.52 mmol per liter). Patients were randomized to receive 2 grams of icosapent ethyl twice daily with food or a placebo.  At one year, triglycerides were reduced by 18.3% or 39.0 mg per deciliter (−0.44 mmol per liter) in the icosapent ethyl group, and increased by 2.2% or 4.5 mg per deciliter (0.05 mmol per liter) in the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the primary end point (a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina) occurred in 17.2% of patients in the icosapent ethyl group, compared with 22.0% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.83; P<0.001), corresponding with an absolute risk reduction of 4.8% and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 21. Similarly, the secondary end point (a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) occurred in 11.2% of patients in the icosapent ethyl group, and 14.8% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.83; P<0.001), corresponding with an absolute risk reduction of 3.6% and a NNT of 28.

Mechanistically, it remains unknown if the benefit of icosapent ethyl observed in REDUCE-IT is due to the reduction of serum triglycerides alone or in combination with other pathways such as the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaque membranes, reduced inflammation, or perhaps an antithrombotic effect.(2) Importantly, cardiovascular benefits achieved in REDUCE-IT were similar across all baseline levels of triglycerides, and these benefits occurred irrespective of triglyceride levels attained at one year.(2) Furthermore, REDUCE-IT was not the first clinical trial to demonstrate benefit from triglyceride-lowering therapy in patients with elevated triglycerides. While many view the fibrate trials as justification to reject the triglyceride-lowering hypothesis, almost none of these trials enrolled patients on the basis of hypertriglyceridemia, the hallmark inclusion criteria of REDUCE-IT.(9)  In one randomized fibrate trial that enrolled patients with hypertriglyceridemia and previous myocardial infarction, treatment with clofibrate and nicotinic acid reduced serum triglycerides by 19% and resulted in a relative risk reduction in death from ischemic heart disease by 36% and all-cause mortality by 28%.(10) Among six fibrate trials that included a post hoc subgroup analysis of subjects with hypertriglyceridemia at baseline, reductions in ischemic heart disease were observed in all trials.(11-15) Although hypertriglyceridemia subgroups were not prespecified at the time of enrollment, and the results should therefore be regarded as hypothesis-generating, the subsequent combined analysis of these trials did demonstrate a 43% reduction of coronary events for each 1 mmol per liter reduction in serum triglycerides.(16)

Potential mechanisms that explain elevated triglycerides and their role in the development of ASCVD include experimental observations that triglyceride-rich lipoproteins can penetrate into the arterial intima.(17,18) The subsequent degradation by lipoprotein lipase can then result in the liberation of free fatty acids and monoacylglycerols, both of which may be inflammatory to the arterial intima and endothelial surfaces.(9,19) This may simultaneously promote macrophage foam cell formation, the hallmark of atherosclerosis.(9,20) Using multidirectional Mendelian randomization, both elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and LDL-C have been identified as causal risk factors for ischemic heart disease. Interestingly, a causal association with systemic inflammation and elevated C-reactive protein appears unique to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and is not observed with elevated levels of LDL-C.(6)

In conjunction with triglyceride-lowering pharmacotherapy, healthcare providers should promote evidence-based dietary and lifestyle recommendations to reduce residual cardiovascular risk associated with excess triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. The reduction of saturated fat and substitution for mono- and polyunsaturated fats has long been advocated for the sake of reducing serum LDL, however, these dietary modifications do not result in appreciable reductions in serum triglycerides.(21) In randomized trials of at least a 12-month duration, Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets have demonstrated more favorable reductions in serum triglycerides compared to low-fat diets.(22,23) Reductions in serum triglycerides with low-carbohydrate diets have also been demonstrated to occur independent of weight loss.(24) Importantly, randomized trials have also demonstrated that dietary restriction of refined sugars alone, namely sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup, with isocaloric substitution of complex carbohydrates results in appreciable reductions in serum triglycerides, independent of caloric intake, carbohydrate intake, and  weight loss.(25,26) Excessive alcohol consumption is also recognized as a modifiable dietary lifestyle risk factor associated with elevated serum triglycerides.(27,28) Therefore, in addition to promoting weight loss and regular physical exercise in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridemia, defined as fasting or nonfasting triglycerides 175 to 499 mg per deciliter (2.0-5.6 mmol per liter), healthcare providers should specifically advocate for the avoidance of added and refined sugars, highly processed foods, and excessive alcohol consumption.(29)

Despite multiple and diverse bodies of evidence that have implicated hypertriglyceridemia as a treatable risk factor for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, there are clinical challenges and unanswered questions that remain. While non-prescription omega-3 supplementation  has been shown to reduce serum triglycerides, it has failed to demonstrate consistent and convincing cardiovascular disease benefit.(30-32) In the Japan EPA lipid intervention study (JELIS), adult Japanese men and women with total cholesterol levels greater than 250 mg per deciliter (6.5 mmol per liter) were randomly assigned to receive either 1800 mg of EPA daily with statin or statin alone. Among the subgroup of patients with triglyceride levels greater than 150 mg per deciliter (1.7 mmol per liter), major coronary events were reduced, however, these benefits were not statistically significant.(33) More recently, Statin Residual Risk Reduction with EpaNova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia (STRENGTH), a large randomized controlled trial evaluating Epanova, a fish oil-derived mixture composed of EPA and DHA, was terminated early due to a low likelihood of cardiovascular benefit in patients with mixed dyslipidemia.(34) Meanwhile, we enthusiastically await the results of Pemafibrate to Reduce Cardiovascular Outcomes by Reducing Triglycerides in Patients with Diabetes (PROMINENT), a randomized controlled trial evaluating Pemafibrate and cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients with dyslipidemia but optimally controlled serum LDL-C.(35) It is our hope that ongoing research and clinical trials will refine our understanding of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in the context of ASCVD,  and more importantly, provide conclusive evidence regarding meaningful therapeutic interventions.  

1.     Pradhan AD. A New Beginning for Triglyceride-Lowering Therapies. Circulation. 2019;140(3):167-169.

2.     Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):11-22.

3.     Do R, Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, et al. Common variants associated with plasma triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45(11):1345-1352.

4.     Varbo A, Benn M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Jorgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol as a causal risk factor for ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):427-436.

5.     Bernelot Moens SJ, Verweij SL, Schnitzler JG, et al. Remnant Cholesterol Elicits Arterial Wall Inflammation and a Multilevel Cellular Immune Response in Humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(5):969-975.

6.     Varbo A, Benn M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Elevated remnant cholesterol causes both low-grade inflammation and ischemic heart disease, whereas elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol causes ischemic heart disease without inflammation. Circulation. 2013;128(12):1298-1309.

7.     Thomsen M, Varbo A, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Low nonfasting triglycerides and reduced all-cause mortality: a mendelian randomization study. Clin Chem. 2014;60(5):737-746.

8.     Carroll M, Kit B, Lacher D. Trends in elevated triglyceride in adults: United States, 2001-2012. NCHS data brief. 2015(198):198.

9.     Nordestgaard BG. Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: New Insights From Epidemiology, Genetics, and Biology. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):547-563.

10.   Carlson LA, Rosenhamer G. Reduction of mortality in the Stockholm Ischaemic Heart Disease Secondary Prevention Study by combined treatment with clofibrate and nicotinic acid. Acta medica Scandinavica. 1988;223(5):405-418.

11.   Group AS, Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, et al. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1563-1574.

12.   Scott R, O’Brien R, Fulcher G, et al. Effects of fenofibrate treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in 9,795 individuals with type 2 diabetes and various components of the metabolic syndrome: the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(3):493-498.

13.   Secondary prevention by raising HDL cholesterol and reducing triglycerides in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2000;102(1):21-27.

14.   Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(6):410-418.

15.   Manninen V, Elo MO, Frick MH, et al. Lipid alterations and decline in the incidence of coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. Jama. 1988;260(5):641-651.

16.   Nordestgaard BG, Varbo A. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. The Lancet. 2014;384(9943):626-635.

17.   Shaikh M, Wootton R, Nordestgaard BG, et al. Quantitative studies of transfer in vivo of low density, Sf 12-60, and Sf 60-400 lipoproteins between plasma and arterial intima in humans. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11(3):569-577.

18.   Nordestgaard BG, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Lewis B. Influx in vivo of low density, intermediate density, and very low density lipoproteins into aortic intimas of genetically hyperlipidemic rabbits. Roles of plasma concentrations, extent of aortic lesion, and lipoprotein particle size as determinants. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12(1):6-18.

19.   Goldberg IJ, Bornfeldt KE. Lipids and the endothelium: bidirectional interactions. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013;15(11):365.

20.   Skarlatos SI, Dichek HL, Fojo SS, Brewer HB, Kruth HS. Absence of triglyceride accumulation in lipoprotein lipase-deficient human monocyte-macrophages incubated with human very low density lipoprotein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76(3):793-796.

21.   Hooper L, Martin N, Abdelhamid A, Davey Smith G. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(6):CD011737.

22.   Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;297(9):969-977.

23.   Shai I, Schwarzfuchs D, Henkin Y, et al. Weight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;359(3):229-241.

24.   Gardner CD, Trepanowski JF, Gobbo LCD, et al. Effect of Low-Fat vs Low-Carbohydrate Diet on 12-Month Weight Loss in Overweight Adults and the Association With Genotype Pattern or Insulin Secretion. JAMA. 2018.

25.   Jalilvand A, Behrouz V, Nikpayam O, Sohrab G, Hekmatdoost A. Effects of low fructose diet on glycemic control, lipid profile and systemic inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2020.

26.   Lustig RH, Mulligan K, Noworolski SM, et al. Isocaloric fructose restriction and metabolic improvement in children with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(2):453-460.

27.   Crouse JR, Grundy SM. Effects of alcohol on plasma lipoproteins and cholesterol and triglyceride metabolism in man. Journal of lipid research. 1984;25(5):486-496.

28.   Klop B, do Rego AT, Cabezas MC. Alcohol and plasma triglycerides. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2013;24(4):321-326.

29.   Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(24):3168-3209.

30.   Abdelhamid AS, Brown TJ, Brainard JS, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3(2):Cd003177.

31.   Hu Y, Hu FB, Manson JE. Marine Omega-3 Supplementation and Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Controlled Trials Involving 127 477 Participants. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(19):e013543.

32.   Aung T, Halsey J, Kromhout D, et al. Associations of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplement Use With Cardiovascular Disease Risks: Meta-analysis of 10 Trials Involving 77 917 Individuals. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(3):225-234.

33.   Yokoyama M, Origasa H, Matsuzaki M, et al. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on major coronary events in hypercholesterolaemic patients (JELIS): a randomised open-label, blinded endpoint analysis. Lancet. 2007;369(9567):1090-1098.

34.   AstraZeneca. Update on Phase III STRENGTH trial for Epanova in mixed dyslipidaemia. https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/update-on-phase-iii-strength-trial-for-epanova-in-mixed-dyslipidaemia-13012020.html. Published 2020. Accessed May 27, 2020.

35.   Pradhan AD, Paynter NP, Everett BM, et al. Rationale and design of the Pemafibrate to Reduce Cardiovascular Outcomes by Reducing Triglycerides in Patients with Diabetes (PROMINENT) study. Am Heart J. 2018;206:80-93.

Similar Posts